Fastest BP

Following a suggestion, which seems to have striken a chord with the masses, The current topic of discussion shall be blackpowder development and optimisation. Start posting replies here.

It was a great idea of mine indeed. I have just recently made a ground breaking discovery, for me anyway. I tested grained black powder yesterday and the speed improvement over normal powder was unbelievable, now I will convert everything to grains.

OK, to get things moving I did a preliminary test of the the artillery method. This isn't meant to be my entry, I was only prototyping the method to see how much charge would be needed, and what would be likely to happen:

Mortar: 25mm ID by 18cm inside length (21 cm total length - 3cm plug). 2mm fuse hole

Projectile: Paper can shell casing partly filled with sand. OD: approx 24.5mm. Basically as close a fit as possible in the mortar, but not so tight it wouldn't drop down. Length: 6cm. Weight: 20.00g

Charge: 2.00g of 0.75 to 2mm barbeque charcoal BP.

I fired this pointed straight up. The shell lifted hard, to say the least - big THUMP. I guess it was quite dense. I don't have a stopwatch yet, so I just counted seconds. It spent about 5.5 - 6 seconds in the air. I'll need a stopwatch for the final test - this was, as I say, just preliminary. For the real test, I suggest sieving the BP to 1.5-2mm, partly as that way everone's grain sizes will be more similar, and partly as the shell lifted very hard. If, like me, you don't have all the correct sized sieves, I suggest drilling holes in a yoghurt pot, or something like that. Apart from that, I think that this could work OK as the standard way to do this. Any objections?

When you are conducting trials like this it is essential that the constants REMAIN constant and the variables are ACCOUNTED FOR. Otherwise, you are wasting your time and BP. It may be an idea, for example, to set the samples off electrically, so the stop watch button can be pressed at the same time as 'fire'. This is more accurate than waiting for the lift 'thump', and by the time your finger presses 'Start' the shell may be half way in the air.

Thanks for pointing that out. I was trying to keep it simple, but electrical firing shouldn't be too hard. On the other hand, I personally am interested in this mainly for fun - I already know that my BP is fine for what I need and know roughly how much I need to lift a shell. Therefore millisecond accuracy is not such a concern for me, but I will be happy to use an electrical firing system if that is what everyone else wants.

I suppose other variables I should have mentioned include moisture content of the powder and ambient temperature. Eliminating variables may make the trials fairer, but theoretically, if you eliminate all variables, everyone will get identical results. Clearly, that is not what we are trying to achieve.

I think we all agree that everyone?s powder should be of roughly the same grain size, as whilst finer grained powders would probably lift the shell higher in this scenario, that does not necessarily make them "better" powders, it just means that you used a finer sieve. However, better charcoal would produce a powder that would lift a shell higher too. Does everyone therefore have to use the same charcoal? Probably not, as increased charcoal quality may well be the result of greater skill as a charcoal maker. Therefore we have to differentiate between an variable that should be eliminated, and a variable that shows the skill of the powder maker.

Apart from the obvious - powder quantity, shell weight, mortar length etc, I think it may be a good idea if everyone?s powder was at roughly the same temperature, eg room temperature, which is probably not far off 20 degrees.

However, I think that such variables as milling time, moisture content, charcoal type, grain density and grain shape are more representative of the quality of the powder, so should be left to everyone?s own personal taste.

Finally, there is powder composition to consider. IMHO, this is a little more mixed. Obviously something like H3 is going to send a shell far higher than the same amount of BP, so shouldn't be allowed in the competition. Similarly, catalysts such as red iron oxide may improve the performance of the BP, but is it still BP? Again, probably not. However, as I mentioned previously in another thread, my best BP is 70:20:10. Should this be allowed? I think it should, since it is still a black powder mixture by definition, and in some ways falls into the same category as the charcoal - different performance as a result of different, but none the less acceptable chemical composition. I hope I'm not being too subjective.

Please add anything you think should be considered, as well as your thoughts on electrical firing. Plenty of people have expressed some interest in this competition, so; your thoughts please...

I think it should be Saltpeter + Charcoal + Sulfur only, but of any percentages you like. However I'd like to be able to compare BP to other compositions as well, in particular benzolift and other potentional replacements. In particular I am looking for expedient, cheap and servicable powder, not the best matched to a particular mortar for winning pyrogolf.

Unless we are going to meet and all shoot with the same equipment it isn't a competition, rather just a discussion of the practices we find makes the best BP. I think stop watch timing from the sound alone is fine for getting a general idea. If you always test with the same equipment then you are only trying to beat yourself, which is probably best anyway as there is no way we can prove someone's claims unless we test it ourselves on the same gear.

Edited by alany, 01 March 2004 - 10:42 PM.

Stopwatch timings should be fine for home trials.

I think that the electrical firing/timing circuits should be held off now, but should be used if we ever do manage a forum meetup.

Actually this would be a fine activity for a meet as we can make the environmental variables [temp/humidity etc] constant for everybody.

Gentlemen - Start your ball mills....

I have tested BP and magnesium together.The magnesium makes the BP more powerful and faster only if the magnesium is like dust or atomized.

BP 80%
Mg 20%

And it is more powerful if you do it opposite

atomized Mg 90%
BP 10%
Ofcourse mix it well.

Why bother when there is nothing wrong with normal black powder?! Why reinvent the wheel when it rolls along just fine already.

Normal BP is fine for everything that it is used for, and much, much cheaper and safer that a BP and Mg mixture. If you need faster BP, you just use a finer granulation.

BTW, I haven't forgotten about this BP testing idea, only I haven't got a stopwatch yet. Has anyone else done anything?

Not really.

I made a batch or two of benzolift and was totally blow away with how powerful it is for how trivial it is to make. If anything, its a little too powerful, I think at the back of my mind I am thinking "this is 80% whistle, use to much and you'll have a DDT you idiot!" but it seems to stay on the burning side of things for less than 20 g charges - the largest I've tried so far.

The big advantage I've seen is you just screen together the ingredients and granulate, no milling required - which of corse was the whole point of experimenting with it. It also burns about a kilo kelvin hotter than BP. On the bad side, it takes potassium perchlorate which is more expensive than potassium nitrate and sodium benzoate is a waxy bitch of a substance to work with.

I also can't get over my lift looking light grey.

Who can equal this black powder

PanMaster: Impressive. How much was was that, and how fine was it?

alany: I saw your mine video - quite a muzzle report from that 10g charge (probably wasn't so great at the time though, I guess ) Nice result from the 5g one though.

Why not do a train of the stuff and then set it going. We can then see how well it really goes

Stuart

what is benzolift ive never heard of it before