Looking at the "old" home page I cant help but notice they can not even afford to have it hosted on a decent server hence various adverts are placed at the top of the page... even better, all were adverts for selling fireworks...... on an anti fireworks web site..lol.. that is priceless!
Mark
lol
I was amazed that not one of them was aware of the wealth of laws that already exist. They could have a point, but all they complain about is noise, they could push for safety, but they are morons and cannot see that a ban on public sale will not stop the public from obtaining them, I alone can think of dozens of ways that it would fall flat on it's face.
They could make valid points like, maybe most 18 year olds in certain areas are not mature enough to have fireworks, but they do not. The argument should be a gigantic debate, there are many many points, but they go on their petty campaign to have a total ban because they think they are the majority and they are above everyone else. A lot of them try to take the moral high ground, a lot of them use discussing language but the organisation will probably turn around and say that those are the views of a few extremist non-members. They would probably have a point then!
There are a lot of things you can do without costing the public billions of pounds to improve safety. Maybe 21 years old to purchase, tougher, or should I say correct policing of youths that seek only to ruin lives because "there is nothing to do", or perhaps one quite well made point by another member on this forum, stop selling them in bloody newsagents.
All those that post on the NCFS forum seem only annoyed about the noise pollution, they also seem to exaggerate a lot, one of them also refuses to believe that gun crime went up after the pistol ban. I personally do not think they are worth the time of day, however, important lessons should be taken from similar groups in the past. One small group of extremists managed to push the gov into a pistol ban without realising it would cost over ?100 per tax payer, it is similar groups that influenced legalisation that makes it nie on impossible to have a fireworks factory here, and now they complain about child slavery and horrific accident rates in china, hypocrites!
He who has the loudest mouth, gets his way. I know that the mature, down to earth and discrete adults do not have it in their nature to loud mouth it and engage in debate that is made pathetic by extremists, but needs must; we may very well see history repeat itself and see another mindless ban.
When I watched the ITV1 Lunchtime News during The Pulse feature on Fri Nov 4th and when Noel Tobin was asked do you have any advice for anyone using a box of fireworks this weekend, all he could say was "They can't be used safely at all". He is an idiot;I would have said"provided the instructions are followed on the fireworks there's no problem at all". As a general rule, if fireworks are used according to the instructions, then they will not cause any harm/injury or damage. Duh! By saying "they can't be used safely at all", he is a dork and it also proves how anti-firework he is! 
