Jump to content


Photo

Hydroscopic, Hygroscopic or neither?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 pymp

pymp

    Trying to move into SFX..

  • General Public Members
  • PipPip
  • 93 posts

Posted 15 September 2006 - 08:05 PM

Having heard the term "hydroscopic" used frequently to describe the ability for a chemical or material to absorb water from the atmosphere, I was suprised to find out that the term has nothing to do with this.
Hydroscopic is pertaining to a "hydroscope";

*hydroscopic*:

Noun
An optical device used for viewing objects far below the surface of water.
Other forms
hy'dro?scop'ic adj.


Whereas Hygroscopic seems to be the correct term;

*hygroscopic*:

Adjective
Readily absorbing moisture, as from the atmosphere.
Other forms
hy'gro?scop'i?cal?ly adv.hy'gro?sco?pic'i?ty n.


However, this site seems to suggest that neither words can be used to describe a material's ability to absorb water. (Although the definition it then provides for hygroscopic seems somewhat contradictory).

I apologise if this is, infact, old news.

Dave

#2 Richard H

Richard H

    Pyro Forum Veteran

  • Admin
  • 2,706 posts

Posted 15 September 2006 - 08:49 PM

The way it is pronounced may be a cause for people misspelling it.

#3 pyromaniac303

pyromaniac303

    Member

  • UKPS Members
  • 632 posts

Posted 15 September 2006 - 09:32 PM

The way it is pronounced may be a cause for people misspelling it.


Everyone thinks 'Water, hydration etc, so it must be hydro!' but a hygrometer is used for measuring humidity or the vapour content of a gas (I use one at work for testing things).
You can never have a long enough fuse...




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users