
BP rockets
#1
Posted 26 January 2009 - 03:54 AM
these rockets are very powerfull and just about send my shells into next week,
when i think of a 3LB rocket i visualise 3LBS of sugar riding on the top, ( thats pretty heavy )
#2
Posted 26 January 2009 - 05:10 AM
Common BP Rocket Engine Sizes (PASSFIRE)
Size..........I.D..........Length
2 oz..........3/8"..........2-3/4"
4 oz..........1/2"..........5"
8 oz..........5/8" .........6-1/4"
1 lb...........3/4"..........7-1/2"
2 lb...........7/8" .........10"
3 lb...........1" ............10"
4 lb...........1-1/4".......12"
6 lb...........1-1/2".......16"
Rocket size.........Payload
2 oz....................1/2 oz
4 oz................... 1 oz
8 oz....................2-3 oz
1 lb.....................4-6 oz
2 lb...................8-10 oz
3 lb..................12-14 oz
4 lb..................16 oz
6 lb..................18-24 oz
The above is a rather conservative estimate of the payload weight for a BP rocket. Properly tuned and optimized designs can exceed these estimates quite readily.
Edited by spanner, 26 January 2009 - 05:31 AM.
#3
Posted 26 January 2009 - 06:25 AM
i couldn't get my head around a 1" ID rocket about 7" long lifting 1.5kg of sugar ,
at that rate i could almost ride my own rocket and light the shell up there

#4
Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:44 AM
The cardboard rocket tube used to be put into a metal tube to prevent the case splitting when it was charged and the grading is the weight of a lead ball that would just fit into the metal tube.
Now they generally just tend to be measured in fractions of a an inch or millimetres.
To reduce the amount of BP you use, you might want to try endburners. They are quicker to make and use a lot less powder.
The ones I have been working on are 18mm I.D and use a clay choke with a 3mm hole (yep 3mm is right), that just goes into the powder. The length of the powder increment inside is about 30mm and they reach about 60 metres or more. They burn for around 4 seconds and I have lifted 50 grammes with them. (still experimenting with max payload weight). The BP is straight homemade willow BP 75:15:10. It is not optimum BP for other uses but it works for this. If you try it and get CATO's either increase the size of the choke hole or add a little charcoal to tame the mix.
#5
Posted 26 January 2009 - 12:19 PM
You got that right!Rocket grading is a bit odd.
The question of rocket sizes was the very first question I asked on a forum, I believe it was the APC Forum.
In any event, here's a posts on the subject, sorry I cannot give proper credit, as I don't remember who posted it. Probably from rec.pyro Google group:
"The lead ball was the same as the OD of the case - the ID of the mould (sleeve) in which the case was held as it was rammed. The moulds were made by spill-boring and reaming, using the same techniques and tools as were used in making gun barrels. By the logic of the day it was perfectly reasonable to describe the diameter by the weight of a bore-fitting lead ball (as indeed we still do when speaking of a "12-bore shotgun," for example - having a calibre of 0.729", which is the diameter of a lead ball weighing 1/12 of a pound).
A lead ball of 4-oz. weight is 1.056" in diameter. Ordinarily the OD was assumed to be 1-1/2 times the ID, which would thus have been 0.704". In British practice, the designation 4-oz. was applied to a 3/4" ID rocket. See Kentish and Browne.
Somehow or other the American practice came to be to multiply the British designation by 4, so that a 3/4" ID rocket then became 1-lb. rather than 4-oz. I have heard several speculations about how this came to be, but the most likely explanation is good old-fashioned American hucksterism. One pound sounds more impressive than four ounces. The identification of a 3/4" ID rocket case as "1-lb." was in use as early as the date of Weingart's first edition (1930). He writes: "Of late, the diameters and lengths of Roman candles and rockets have been changed and reduced so often that no standard of sizes can be given, but the following will be found to be useful for average work..." (this text occurs in all editions, and may be found on p. 27 of the 1947 ed.)."
END
Indeed, end-burning rockets might be a solution. If you'd like to see a little more on the subject of 6 pound end-burners, take a look at:
http://fogoforum.us/rocket.php
#6
Posted 26 January 2009 - 08:28 PM
The big problem is that as the shell gets bigger the rocket has to get bigger and the stick becomes a plank. Then you have to find somewhere to fire that can safely accept a 10 pound stick/javelin coming out of the sky in the dark.
Keep mannequins and watermelons away from fireworks..they always get hurt..
#7
Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:57 PM
#8
Posted 27 January 2009 - 08:26 AM
http://fogoforum.us/rocket.php,
and did i hear you corectly mortatube, " a 3mm choke" i'll have to give it a run, i've got some 4" x 1" tubes coming,
i went into passfire yesterday and was awe struck,, the tutorials are magnificent,, it would have taken me months if not years to find the treasure trove of info they have there, and still not found as much,,
i'm gunna be a busy boy for a while,, and just in the nick of time as i'm ready ( i think) to try my hand at some mortars and different shells,
#9
Posted 27 January 2009 - 09:28 AM
With an endburner 1" I.D, the tube will only need to be about 2.5" long. They require much less length of propellent than a core burner.
As I mentioned before, mine have an 18mm I.D and a propellant length of around 30mm. So just less than twice the I.D.
If you can remove a bit from the length of the tube you can save a little weight and the stick can be marginally smaller too.
#10
Posted 27 January 2009 - 10:50 PM
"common" bp rocket sizes? there's nothing common about those larger sizes! the largest ive made was a 3lb, 1 id, 10 long with an 8 inch core, and it was jolly hard to get off the spindle i can tell you! how practical would it be to build a bp rocket 16" long?The "weight" designation of BP rocket motors do not refer to the lifting ability of the rocket, it's just a size designation for the rocket's ID and length.
Common BP Rocket Engine Sizes (PASSFIRE)
Size..........I.D..........Length
2 oz..........3/8"..........2-3/4"
4 oz..........1/2"..........5"
8 oz..........5/8" .........6-1/4"
1 lb...........3/4"..........7-1/2"
2 lb...........7/8" .........10"
3 lb...........1" ............10"
4 lb...........1-1/4".......12"
6 lb...........1-1/2".......16"
Rocket size.........Payload
2 oz....................1/2 oz
4 oz................... 1 oz
8 oz....................2-3 oz
1 lb.....................4-6 oz
2 lb...................8-10 oz
3 lb..................12-14 oz
4 lb..................16 oz
6 lb..................18-24 oz
The above is a rather conservative estimate of the payload weight for a BP rocket. Properly tuned and optimized designs can exceed these estimates quite readily.

#11
Posted 28 January 2009 - 01:49 AM
Get your 6 lb. BP rocket tooling here: http://www.wolterpyr...catg&cat=rocket
If you wanted a 6 lb. BP rocket, but shorter- opt for a stinger or end burner. Or a whistle fueled rocket. More than one way to get it done.

#12
Posted 28 January 2009 - 09:23 PM
yes the tooling is available( from another country) and pricey to $240! for £15's worth of ali!
i just don't think they would be worth the effort to make
Edited by chris m, 28 January 2009 - 09:24 PM.
#13
Posted 29 January 2009 - 03:27 PM
But some people just want to build the "biggest, baddest" of their ilk- practicality be damned.
While they do require a considerable commitment, it might be a mistake to judge the cost of the tooling solely on the amount of material contained- taken to an extreme, a person's worth maybe 2 quid- based on the raw chemicals contained therein!

The bottom line for me is: Vive la différence!
Edited by spanner, 29 January 2009 - 03:55 PM.
#14
Posted 30 January 2009 - 01:52 PM
very good usefull information there spanner" that makes alot of sence,
i couldn't get my head around a 1" ID rocket about 7" long lifting 1.5kg of sugar ,
at that rate i could almost ride my own rocket and light the shell up there
Not sure you could do that with BP, but a decent composite propellant motor of those dimensions ought to get it off thr ground.
#15
Posted 30 January 2009 - 10:21 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users