Are they that scared?
OK, Looked again and they have returned - possibly a web glitch - am I getting paranoid?
Edited by phildunford, 04 December 2009 - 09:35 PM.
Photo Terrorists
Started by phildunford, Dec 03 2009 08:30 PM
22 replies to this topic
#16
phildunford
-
- General Public Members
-
- 2,299 posts
Member
Posted 04 December 2009 - 09:19 PM
I can barely belive this, but this petition that was showing about 30 odd signatures at midday has now been reduced to 11. Many, including my wifes appear to have been removed!
Are they that scared?
OK, Looked again and they have returned - possibly a web glitch - am I getting paranoid?
Are they that scared?
OK, Looked again and they have returned - possibly a web glitch - am I getting paranoid?
Teaching moft plainly, and withall moft exactly, the composing of all manner of fire-works for tryumph and recreation (John Bate 1635)
thegreenman
thegreenman
#17
crystal palace fireworks
-
- General Public Members
-
- 950 posts
Keith
Posted 04 December 2009 - 11:04 PM
That is what we have now.
Yes, but not in the context to the points I make in my earlier postings.
#18
crystal palace fireworks
-
- General Public Members
-
- 950 posts
Keith
Posted 04 December 2009 - 11:15 PM
I can barely belive this, but this petition that was showing about 30 odd signatures at midday has now been reduced to 11. Many, including my wifes appear to have been removed!
Are they that scared?
OK, Looked again and they have returned - possibly a web glitch - am I getting paranoid?
It would not surprise me if our signatures were being collated for MI5 files,.....or interpreted as an act of potential terrorism!.......what a pathetic, sad, controlling, paranoid government we have!
#19
pyrotrev
-
- UKPS Members
-
- 1,112 posts
Pyro Forum Top Trump
Posted 05 December 2009 - 12:22 PM
Check The Independent today - looks like someone has taken notice 
Trying to do something very beautiful but very dangerous very safely....
#20
crystal palace fireworks
-
- General Public Members
-
- 950 posts
Keith
Posted 05 December 2009 - 04:45 PM
Check The Independent today - looks like someone has taken notice
Good article,..lets hope the plastics (pcso`s) take note!
#21
phildunford
-
- General Public Members
-
- 2,299 posts
Member
Posted 05 December 2009 - 08:12 PM
Maybe commonsense has prevailed.
But I'd keep on signing anyway!
But I'd keep on signing anyway!
Teaching moft plainly, and withall moft exactly, the composing of all manner of fire-works for tryumph and recreation (John Bate 1635)
thegreenman
thegreenman
#22
Daedalus
-
- General Public Members
-
- 89 posts
Me, I only do Cat. 3
Posted 05 December 2009 - 10:55 PM
Maybe commonsense has prevailed.
But I'd keep on signing anyway!
Phil, you have another signature. Frankly I am sick of the draconian and ineffectual laws passed by this government in the name of the war on terror. I don't expect this petition to do any good as they don't seem to give a damn about these petitions, but still more than happy to sign up for it.
This is an interesting link to your rights under section 44 - basically you don't have to give your name and address, nor do you have to co-operate with the police. Certainly they do not seem to have the ability to delete, or make you delete, photographs on your camera (which presumably, would be destruction of evidence if they were to try and charge you).
#23
Creepin_pyro
-
- General Public Members
-
- 1,198 posts
Pyro Forum Top Trump
Posted 06 December 2009 - 11:50 AM
If you want to see the disposition of guards, security cameras etc, you only have to look - are they going to stop us looking next?
In a word, yes
Edited by Creepin_pyro, 06 December 2009 - 11:58 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
