Pentaerythritol
#1
Posted 13 April 2010 - 06:30 PM
Now im not going to say a word, i know my thoughts, i also know what application Pentaerythritol has in PETN, however my chemsistry horizons are somewhat limited when it comes to exotic compounds, can anybody see any profound or negative effects PE would have on this composition because i can't!
Cheers in advance
www.illusionfireworks.com - A SKY FULL OF MAGIC!
#2
Posted 13 April 2010 - 06:37 PM
www.illusionfireworks.com - A SKY FULL OF MAGIC!
#3
Posted 13 April 2010 - 06:43 PM
1 I see no chemical advantage over conventional flash
2 It's a waste of good organic intermediates that have better uses.
Interesting also that the popup ads from google were a UK EOD company and printer cartridges!
Keep mannequins and watermelons away from fireworks..they always get hurt..
#4
Posted 13 April 2010 - 08:00 PM
One interesting exotic flash-like mix is the HMTD and Dark Pyro Al used as the comp to dust the inside of shock tube. I don't know whether any additional oxidiser is used, so it's probably not a binary flash mix in the traditional sense.
Given that we try not not to discuss HE on this site however, I'll leave it there...
#5
Posted 13 April 2010 - 09:24 PM
As mentioned before this is just a waste of pentaerythritol.
used for sundry preparations, and especially for experimental
fire-works."
Dr. James Cutbush
#6
Posted 14 April 2010 - 04:02 AM
70 - Perc
20 - Benzoate
10 - Aluminum
I've been using it more often for larger salutes to save a bit of money. Even in bulk, blackhead aluminum is still $9 a pound. I bet I could replace it with cheaper bright flake.
#7
Posted 14 April 2010 - 04:19 AM
The Chinese have used potassium terephthalate as an intermediate in flash powder mixtures which makes it burn somewhat like a flare outside containment, but explosively inside containment.
#8
Posted 14 April 2010 - 07:03 AM
www.illusionfireworks.com - A SKY FULL OF MAGIC!
#9
Posted 14 April 2010 - 07:39 AM
#10
Posted 14 April 2010 - 05:26 PM
By larger salutes, I meant bottom shots. Plenty of confiment for bright flake, or even atomized to do the trick.
The so called "negative explosives" definitely have merit. I just haven't gotten around to experimenting with them. It's a bit daunting to be working with large salutes, and not know if they'll even go off.
#11
Posted 14 April 2010 - 05:54 PM
#12
Posted 14 April 2010 - 08:53 PM
Copper oxide is at least 2-3 as expensive as perc here. The same goes with potassium sorbate, not cost effective, even for a VERY slight gain in total energy output (less than 3%). It's no less than 4x as expensive.
By larger salutes, I meant bottom shots. Plenty of confiment for bright flake, or even atomized to do the trick.
The so called "negative explosives" definitely have merit. I just haven't gotten around to experimenting with them. It's a bit daunting to be working with large salutes, and not know if they'll even go off.
On the sorbate - Yes, it's expensive unless you buy it in bulk quantities. And it is actually surprisingly fast burning. I have used tiny amounts to produce quite powerful crackers, and it can be used as a booster.
I don't think it can be used as a rocket fuel - it would probably explode. Perhaps with potassium nitrate and sulfur, but definitely not with chlorates or perchlorates.
Edited by MDH, 14 April 2010 - 09:50 PM.
#13
Posted 14 April 2010 - 09:31 PM
It can now be had cheaper than the benzoates! (I will even be offering a special on these soon as I will be getting a big delivery in the next week or two)
#14
Posted 14 April 2010 - 09:33 PM
I will give it a go in a couple of weeks time to see how it performs.
D
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users