UK Pyrotechnics Society Forums: Electric Blue Star Formulae - UK Pyrotechnics Society Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Electric Blue Star Formulae Aluminum / Red Gum Fuel Based

#1 User is offline   44RedHawk 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: General Public Members
  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: 09-August 11

Posted 20 August 2011 - 05:08 PM

Here is a tried and true most beautiful electric blue star formula I developed in 1995 while working at Rockingham Fireworks Manufacturing & Display Co, INC at Seabrook, NH, U.S.A.

Percentage by weight


KCL04 -------------------------------------------.50
Aluminum, Granular 50-150 mesh -------- 12
Parlon --------------------------------------------10
Copper Oxide, Black --------------------------10
Red Gum ---------------------------------------- 8
Copper Oxychloride --------------------------- 5
Aluminum, Dark Pyro ------------------------- 5
Dextrin ------------------------------------------- +5

NOTES: This is a water/Dextrin bound mix for 9.5mm - 12.5mm cut stars utilizing a standard prime. Key ingredient here is the "granular aluminum" of 50-150 mesh which resembles sponge titanium. Produces a medium burn rich blue with gold electric tail.
-Enjoy

This post has been edited by 44RedHawk: 20 August 2011 - 05:10 PM

0

#2 User is offline   JOPETES 

  • New Member
  • Pip
  • Group: General Public Members
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 13-September 11

Posted 26 September 2011 - 03:02 PM

Hello. looks good formula for the components and proportion.

It has good color blue?

For the bright tail, used to aluminum or titanium? I say this because being a low color temperature titanium works better than aluminum.


0

#3 User is offline   pyrotrev 

  • Pyro Forum Top Trump
  • Group: UKPS Members
  • Posts: 1,001
  • Joined: 22-February 03

Posted 27 September 2011 - 01:44 PM

View PostJOPETES, on 26 September 2011 - 03:02 PM, said:

Hello. looks good formula for the components and proportion.

It has good color blue?

For the bright tail, used to aluminum or titanium? I say this because being a low color temperature titanium works better than aluminum.


You're right Jo. However the more golden tail you get with underoxidised aluminium may look good.
Trying to do something very beautiful but very dangerous very safely....
0

#4 User is offline   Pyro Harold 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: General Public Members
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 28-December 10

Posted 20 October 2011 - 12:06 PM

If I was to omit the dark pyro aluminium, how much would this affect the performance of the star? There really isn't a substitute for dark pyro aluminium is there?
0

#5 User is offline   Pyro Harold 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: General Public Members
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 28-December 10

Posted 26 October 2011 - 10:58 AM

View PostPyro Harold, on 20 October 2011 - 12:06 PM, said:

If I was to omit the dark pyro aluminium, how much would this affect the performance of the star? There really isn't a substitute for dark pyro aluminium is there?



Can anyone suggest something here? What kind of mesh is dark aluminium pyro? If I was to substitute with the same mesh normal aluminium powder, how much would this diminish the effect?
0

#6 User is offline   Creepin_pyro 

  • Pyro Forum Top Trump
  • Group: UKPS Members
  • Posts: 1,140
  • Joined: 27-January 04

Posted 26 October 2011 - 11:33 AM

View PostPyro Harold, on 26 October 2011 - 10:58 AM, said:

Can anyone suggest something here? What kind of mesh is dark aluminium pyro? If I was to substitute with the same mesh normal aluminium powder, how much would this diminish the effect?


As noted, the key ingredient for the tail is the granular Al. Leaving out the dark Al will probably not change the effect massively (and might even improve colour depth) and replacing with a fine flake Al would probably produce similar results to the dark Al.
0

#7 User is offline   Mumbles 

  • Pyro Forum Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: General Public Members
  • Posts: 909
  • Joined: 01-July 05

Posted 26 October 2011 - 09:40 PM

If you have any, I'd possibly look into replacing the dark pyro Al with -200 or -325 mesh MgAl. It's difficult to say which product is really in there, but for most stars I've seen that call for dark Al, they mean American dark Al (#809). This is approximately a -325 mesh flake Al. It's not unlike bright flake Al, but it goes through a different production process. Even using bright Al may make due. This is not to be confused with black or blackhead aluminums, which are much finer and go through a slightly different process still. Those are typically only used for one main effect, and a few other minor things.

Besides brightening the color and increasing the burn rate, the finer metallic portion may also serve the purpose to heat the formula up enough to light the coarse Al. Some organic formulas need a little coaxing to light certain things. You won't know until you try that experiment though.
0

#8 User is offline   Pyro Harold 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: General Public Members
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 28-December 10

Posted 27 October 2011 - 10:00 AM

Thanks for the answers!
0

#9 User is offline   Bonny 

  • Pyro Forum Regular
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: General Public Members
  • Posts: 538
  • Joined: 27-December 06

Posted 31 October 2011 - 03:51 AM

Is there any close substitution for the granular Al? All I ever have around, or see for sale is either atomized or flake...
0

#10 User is online   starseeker 

  • Pyro Forum Regular
  • Group: UKPS Members
  • Posts: 472
  • Joined: 28-June 06

Posted 31 October 2011 - 07:50 PM

View PostBonny, on 31 October 2011 - 03:51 AM, said:

Is there any close substitution for the granular Al? All I ever have around, or see for sale is either atomized or flake...


I was wondering whether homemade Mgal could be used as this would be granular and may give a nice effect.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users