
making tubes...
#1
Posted 22 July 2004 - 10:09 PM
?
If it is good paper which one in that list is the right weight for me to use?
#2
Posted 23 July 2004 - 03:27 AM
#3
Posted 23 July 2004 - 03:52 PM
Because i am stuck on this one.
#4
Posted 23 July 2004 - 03:58 PM
How can one tell? Nobody uses this paper.Thanks but is Virgin paper good paper if so pleas read my first post? Thanks.
Because i am stuck on this one.
Ask for a sample, and try it.
#5
Posted 23 July 2004 - 04:09 PM
pyrotechnist I did read ur post. i have never heard of virgin paper before or at least not that i recall. i was just suggesting an alterative since it is readily available. that allThanks but is Virgin paper good paper if so pleas read my first post? Thanks.
Because i am stuck on this one.
Dan
Edited by Dan, 23 July 2004 - 04:11 PM.
#6
Posted 23 July 2004 - 04:23 PM
The thicker the weight of the paper the less turns you need to make the required thickness, this is good for rolling thick-walled tubes. However thicker paper is also more difficult to work with, especially for other things, like pasting in shells.
If you are rolling rocket tubes get the highest grade paper you can and the best value/thickness/workability proposition you can get. Canister shells can use recycled, especially for the pasting-in. Ball shells really need the virgin kraft, even if only for the wet strength.
I use 90 gsm virgin kraft the most often, it is cheap and easy to use, but something like 150+ gsm would be better for easily getting thickness I often need. The hard part is getting a smooth transition inside the tube, you need to tear the edges of thick papers so they lay down well. I usually just use chipboard for really thick tubes with a sheet of thin kraft to hold them together and give good internal surfaces, or buy them commercially, which is really the best option for high performance rocket and gerb tubes.
For match piping, nosing, general pasting-in and other non-critical applications I use the cheap and nasty recycled wrapping paper kraft, it is around 35 gsm I believe, but the brand I use has reasonable wet strength.
http://www.vk2zay.net/
#7
Posted 23 July 2004 - 05:15 PM
It is:
Needed length of Paper = pi * (desired wall thickness / paper thickness) * (inner diametre + desired wall thickness)
It is very accurate and works fine. Now I can make tubes of a desired wall thickness and inner diametre.
PS: The "inner diametre" means the diametre of the rod on which you roll the tube.
Edited by paul, 23 July 2004 - 05:16 PM.
#8
Posted 23 July 2004 - 06:00 PM
As I have said before, I use lining paper, and it is excellent for larger tubes. I have a big roll that was just lying around, so I'm not sure how thick it is, or whether or not it is recycled or virgin, but it is great stuff.
I'd suggest the 150gsm "1000 grade" to start with. I guaruntee you it will be good for something, and it's not like ?1.79 is a huge investment. I should be excellent for rolling tubes for fountains, rockets, candles etc, in the 10-25mm range.
#9
Posted 24 July 2004 - 01:42 PM
EDIT: Hey Phoenix is that paper on that web site good prised for tube production? It comes to ?8.00 i think it did anyways. That is for packing and the paper, you don't need to pay for the postage. Can i also make like 6-7" tubes with lining paper? Thanks agian.
Edited by pyrotechnist, 24 July 2004 - 01:45 PM.
#10
Posted 24 July 2004 - 02:55 PM
I get large sheets of chipboard from Lincraft or Spotlight which are local craft chains.
I also keep all the cereal and frozen food packaging I can, it works great.
http://www.vk2zay.net/
#11
Posted 31 July 2004 - 05:50 PM
I think that whatever paper you used, you would have a hard time rolling anything larger than about 3" by hand. If you've actually got the space or nerve to shoot 6" shells (which most hobbyists probably haven't), you will almost certainly need to buy the mortars.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users