
Standard Traffic light
#1
Posted 04 October 2008 - 07:16 PM
Does anybody know the composition of them and if it would be easy to re-create?
#2
Posted 04 October 2008 - 07:36 PM
#3
Posted 04 October 2008 - 08:15 PM
The red and orange are the ones here on my website
Coloured Lights
But I now use a much better high temperature green - I'll look out the formula...
I'd like to know what was in a Snowstorm too - was it too early for titanium??

#4
Posted 22 June 2010 - 07:04 AM
Maxman
#5
Posted 22 June 2010 - 04:32 PM
Don't know the original comps, but I often replicate this firework (label available at the fireworks museum) with my own comps.
The red and orange are the ones here on my website
Coloured Lights
But I now use a much better high temperature green - I'll look out the formula...
I'd like to know what was in a Snowstorm too - was it too early for titanium??
Traffic light = Lovely little firework that simply lights-up the back drop in any back garden.
Snowstorm,...I believe a recipe was given to UKPS member `Concept` (Doug) by Ron Lancaster at the last Kimbolton visit,........send him a message and ask for it!
#6
Posted 22 June 2010 - 04:43 PM
Maxman
#7
Posted 22 June 2010 - 07:54 PM
If you have 2 similar green and red compositions already mixed, for example:
Green / Red
BaNO3 / SrNO3 60%
MgAl 200# 20%
Parlon 20%
You can then mix a portion of the green and red to obtain any colour between green and red on the spectrum. For example a ratio of 5:1 green to red will give you a lemon yellow, 2:1 green to red gives you an amber that will rival calcium based colours. You should experiment, and mix your own colours to suit. Also the brightness of the 3 colours will be very similar, which is a problem of using a variety of formulae from different authors. The one above is very simple to prepare but gives reasonable colours.
Does anyone know the actual tube ID and wall thickness? On the fireworks museum it says 32mm OD x 89mm length was calculated, but not the ID.
#8
Posted 22 June 2010 - 08:08 PM

Internal diameter, 1 inch.
The tube is grotty and spiral wound, thickness just under 1/4 inch.

#9
Posted 22 June 2010 - 08:14 PM
I use chlorate based organic compositions for my Bengals. Metal fuels are too blinding for stationary light in my humble opinion.
Green: barium chlorate 90%, shellac 10% (Weingart's formula, also for exhibition stars)
Red: 66% strontium nitrate, 25% potassium chlorate, 9% shellac
Yellow: 70% potassium chlorate, 15% cryolite, 15% shellac
The red burns relatively slowly due to the low chlorate content.
Edited by Pyroswede, 22 June 2010 - 08:14 PM.
used for sundry preparations, and especially for experimental
fire-works."
Dr. James Cutbush
#10
Posted 22 June 2010 - 08:19 PM
Here is a 'leak' from the next Spark!
![]()
Internal diameter, 1 inch.
The tube is grotty and spiral wound, thickness just under 1/4 inch.
Wow Phil, I take it that the real mcCoy then? Now I'm confused, that makes the tube thicker than the usual 1/8" walled tubes I use. I thought it was supposed to be thinner to burn away with the comp?
Maxman
#11
Posted 22 June 2010 - 08:23 PM
Wow Phil, I take it that the real mcCoy then? Now I'm confused, that makes the tube thicker than the usual 1/8" walled tubes I use. I thought it was supposed to be thinner to burn away with the comp?
Maxman
Yup - that's the real item. Seems that they were short enough that the light could be seen at the mouth without the tube burning away.
Wish I could remember if that was definitely the case, let loads off when I was a kid, but can't remember if the case stayed intact, I think it did, but it's 40 years since I've seen one!
Anyone else remember?

#12
Posted 22 June 2010 - 09:27 PM
Yup - that's the real item. Seems that they were short enough that the light could be seen at the mouth without the tube burning away.
Wish I could remember if that was definitely the case, let loads off when I was a kid, but can't remember if the case stayed intact, I think it did, but it's 40 years since I've seen one!
Anyone else remember?
I remember the tubes being fairly squat with a reasonably thick wall and as far as I recall they stayed intact as they burned
James
#13
Posted 22 June 2010 - 09:43 PM
i spent many a n hour walking around back streets ect for various old units with names like "banshee" to take off the labels and paste them in a scrap book,
sigh wish still had it! but i was 12! and nobody could understand what the hell i was doing lol.
sometimes you'd hit pay-dirt by finding a " live dud" which was whisked home as fast as you could run for "scrutiny", come to think of it nothings changed..
#14
Posted 22 June 2010 - 10:09 PM
Yup - that's the real item. Seems that they were short enough that the light could be seen at the mouth without the tube burning away.
Wish I could remember if that was definitely the case, let loads off when I was a kid, but can't remember if the case stayed intact, I think it did, but it's 40 years since I've seen one!
Anyone else remember?
Me too Phil, Its really annoying when you can`t be absolutely sure.
But trusting my gut instinct/dodgy memory (even before you put up the photo). I too don`t ever definately recall the casing burning away (fairly thick really). In fact I can`t remember any of my biscuit tin of firework ever having weakish or thin tubes!
The comp must have been slow burning given the overall size of the firework and length of burn time. I don`t even remember them being excessively smokey.
Correct me if Im wrong, but were these made by Standard? if so, did they have a red plastic ground spike?
#15
Posted 23 June 2010 - 06:08 AM
The 1970's/80's style Traffic Lights I have has a 31 mm outside diameter tube. Inside diameter is 26 mm. Tube thickness is 2.5 mm which seems very thin for a fountain. The tube height is 88 mm. I'm pretty sure they came in several sizes.
The mid 1990's style is smaller at 25 mm outside diameter tube. Inside diameter is 19.0 mm. Tube thickness is increased to 3.0 mm. The tube height is 82 mm.


1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users