Interesting tip. Thanks for that one. I will give it a go.
Usual 70:30?
No, I would say 60:40 is a better set of ratios. You can add 2% oxychloride or iron oxide if you like. It doesn't need sulfur, it's already quite sensitive to initiation.
Posted 10 February 2010 - 12:53 AM
Interesting tip. Thanks for that one. I will give it a go.
Usual 70:30?
Posted 11 February 2010 - 08:39 PM
No, I would say 60:40 is a better set of ratios. You can add 2% oxychloride or iron oxide if you like. It doesn't need sulfur, it's already quite sensitive to initiation.
Posted 12 February 2010 - 01:19 AM
Posted 12 February 2010 - 10:45 AM
Give it a try yourself - it is excellent.
Posted 12 February 2010 - 11:36 AM
Posted 12 February 2010 - 11:50 AM
Did you try it, digger?
Also, you should know it can be used to make other sorbates.
Posted 12 February 2010 - 12:10 PM
Edited by MDH, 12 February 2010 - 12:11 PM.
Posted 12 February 2010 - 01:36 PM
Posted 13 February 2010 - 03:13 AM
Edited by MDH, 13 February 2010 - 03:19 AM.
Posted 25 February 2010 - 12:50 AM
Posted 25 February 2010 - 09:53 AM
Posted 01 March 2010 - 03:38 AM
Posted 01 March 2010 - 07:44 PM
Not to be redundant, but how did the tests go? Did you find a more suitable ratio than I did with the 60:40? It certainly is quite a fast composition, isn't it.
I also forgot to mention that this substance makes very clean burning flares, though it's questionable if they should be used in flares when compared to cheaper materials. The flame is quite transparent and slow burning with nitrates, very different than potassium sorbate with a chlorate. I thought to myself that perhaps when I am able to obtain ammonium nitrate (Which is hard here given terrorism suspicions) that I could combine copper sorbate and ammonium chloride with it to obtain that same transparent flame quality, but blue instead.
Posted 08 March 2010 - 02:43 AM
Posted 24 March 2010 - 09:07 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users