Jump to content


Photo

Smoke screen


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 CCH Concepts

CCH Concepts

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 597 posts

Posted 18 September 2012 - 08:29 PM

Hello all

Its been a while since ive been on here, house shares kinda stopped the hobby for me.

But back to my reason for posting, i have been set the challenge of creating a smoke screen. The task has been to link this too a smoke machine, but after trying several machines, the smoke produced simply isnt filling the room quick enough.

So i have been asked to come up with a chemical option. The first option i tried was hydrogen peroxide and potassium permanganate. I am awear of the saftey issues with these chemicals and took appropriate precautions, What was good about this reaction was the only gaseous products produced were H2O and O this made a very large, dense and fast "smoke screen" but obviously being water this quickly dissipated and there is concerns over water damage.

No im looking for others options. I have been looking at Titanium TetraOxide and water. from what i have read this produces a very good dense and lasting smoke screen of TiO2 but also HCl.

So to my question, Would it be practical to pass this gasious product through a salt such as Sodium bicarbonate to remove the HCl leave a non-dangerous TiO2 smoke?

If this is practical can i buy TiClO4? if not can i synthesis it?

If this is not a practical solution are there any other suggestions?

The delivery system in mind, would separate solid by products from the outside environment with only the gaseous products leaving the device.

#2 whoof

whoof

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 399 posts

Posted 18 September 2012 - 09:22 PM

Have you considered dry ice at high level, istr seeing a waterfall effect somewhere which used it ?

#3 Guest_PyroPDC_*

Guest_PyroPDC_*
  • Guests

Posted 18 September 2012 - 09:30 PM

can you not use a bigger smoke machine, even make one all its made of is a heat element and pump my old low fog machine used to have 3 pumps / heaters to produce enough smoke to fill the biggest of stage events in seconds

Edited by PyroPDC, 18 September 2012 - 09:31 PM.


#4 whoof

whoof

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 399 posts

Posted 18 September 2012 - 09:43 PM

Pretty much what i was thinking.

Basically a giant fog machine.
Something along the lines of a wood frame with cheap plastic liner for a water trough
with a bit of guttering above on a hinge holding dry ice for a quick fog followed by standard machine for backup.

#5 CCH Concepts

CCH Concepts

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 597 posts

Posted 18 September 2012 - 09:51 PM

I have discussed TiClO4 and Tin tetrachloride with my brother (who asked me to design the system).

And we have decided the same thing, just build a big arse smoke machine using the glycol smoke fluids.

I'm thinking copper pipe wrapped in nichrome wire should provide enough heat with a high volume pump.

#6 Mortartube

Mortartube

    Pyro Forum Top Trump

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,082 posts

Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:13 PM

If you only need it for the one use, hire a pea souper or one of the very big ones. No safety issues other than known ones and if it all goes wrong owing to a fault, it's down to the hirer and their insurance.
Organisation is a wonderful trait in others

#7 CCH Concepts

CCH Concepts

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 597 posts

Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:26 PM

This will be a standing part of a security system to make theft more difficult.

Alarms sounds, lights go out and property fills with smoke.

So it will have to be reusable, I'm toying with the idea, of replacing the water in a water fire extingisher, pressurising it again and attaching a coil of copper with a nichrome wire wrapped around the pipe to heat.

Idea being if I can have a long enough hot enough pipe to pass the glycol through it will be a very high flow smoke machine.

#8 CCH Concepts

CCH Concepts

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 597 posts

Posted 18 September 2012 - 10:57 PM

how about a powder fire extinguisher filled with TiO2 thats basically what TiClO4 is doing, as its not vaporised as its boiling point is 2972 Celsius, its just airisolizing the TiO2 by product.

#9 martyn

martyn

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • UKPS Members
  • 470 posts

Posted 18 September 2012 - 11:10 PM

Sounds like you are trying to make a smokecloak. They use glycol solution.

#10 portfire

portfire

    Pyro Forum Top Trump

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,231 posts

Posted 19 September 2012 - 08:24 AM

I seem to remember a piece in Tommorrows World years ago with a system like you're after. Only problem is, if the miscreant falls, breaks a leg, YOU'RE liable!! :blink:

Edited by portfire, 19 September 2012 - 08:24 AM.

"I reject your reality and substitute my own" Adam Savage

#11 Creepin_pyro

Creepin_pyro

    Pyro Forum Top Trump

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,198 posts

Posted 19 September 2012 - 09:14 AM

We have a smokecloak at work, I always make sure I'm around when they test/refill it as it's great fun!

RE liability, I believe the systems come with appropriate insurance:

"The potential liability claim was, of course, a real issue; this was solved by an insurance policy to specifically cover this risk. The cover is still provided today free of charge with every Smokecloak and it is interesting to note that after all these years, there has never been a claim.
The police and fire services also had misgivings about the concept; this has been addressed by approved signage provided with every system and both services being advised about every installation."

Not sure how this would work with a homebrew one...

#12 Arthur Brown

Arthur Brown

    General member

  • UKPS Members
  • 2,923 posts

Posted 19 September 2012 - 10:33 AM

Search the Smokecloak system it is a professional solution to the problem.
Beware! you have the chemistry wrong in places. TiCl4 reacts with water to produce TiO2 and HCl This is a violent reaction industrially regarded as explosive. Also the products are a gas that destroys most things and a solid that contaminates everything. It would be like an acid cloud raining grit. and the protected product would be destroyed.
Peroxide and Permanganate will produce high temperature steam which may damage the protected goods, the trouble is that it is again a violent reaction once used (in V2 rockets) for driving high power turbines. Plus of course Peroxide is now very hard to obtain in high concentrations due to its misuse by terrorists and few peaceful uses at high strength -concentration is possible but prone to explosion.
http://www.movember.com/uk/home/

Keep mannequins and watermelons away from fireworks..they always get hurt..

#13 whoof

whoof

    Pyro Forum Regular

  • General Public Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 399 posts

Posted 19 September 2012 - 02:51 PM

Apart from the possibility of irritation, does using glcol not cause a clean up problem ?
House with soft furnisings as opposed to commercial properties ?

edit

cch you have a pm

Edited by whoof, 19 September 2012 - 10:29 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users