NASCAR Roller
#16
Posted 22 July 2004 - 05:07 PM
Now im trying to roll 2 red colored formulas 1 organic 1 magnalium..I started rolling using #6 lead shot i cleaned them with acetone to degrease them then rolled them in bentonite clay.. i was using 25% Alcohol(surgical spirit?? is this ok)
as solvent for the organic fueled stars ,rolling was done in a dog dish it was hard to shake the bowl and add the powder while keeping the stars moving...then spraying the solvent whilst still moving the bowl..
.
. .Now when i haved rolled them up to size how do i finish?.. do i add more powder until the stars wont take any more then stop rolling or do i stop them when still damp? or wet?..My first batch of red magnalium fueled stars i stopped when the were dry...the red organic fueled i have left wet..whats the best way to Finish?..
.
My intention is to make some nice ball shells and they consume vast amounts of stars so im just off down to the garage to Make a NASCAR tyre Star roller so i can increase my productivity .
#17
Posted 25 July 2004 - 03:40 PM
The one's in the pics are redgum based and start of light brown but when wet they go very dark im not sure if i have to wait for them to go back to light brown in colour before i can build up the star size..
.Also i rolled some Red parlon magnalium stars and they are absolutly rock hard after only 1 day of drying i cannot crumble them between my finger and thumb even using both hands?..Yet i made some Blue colored redgum based stars and can easily crumble them even after a day drying hopefully they crumble because there stiill wet?..My next step is to make some star sizing screens so i can accuratley size the stars...simple matter of drilling holes in a plastic bucket Lid?...
#18
Posted 26 July 2004 - 08:00 AM
You've got a great 'harvest' of round stars there - well done!
#19
Posted 26 July 2004 - 08:14 AM
Mark
BPA L1 & L2
#20
Posted 26 July 2004 - 09:32 AM
#21
Posted 27 July 2004 - 02:09 AM
easiest way I can think of is to use a piece of smooth plywood |/ <- kinda shaped like that, a backing and then a piece at an angle, then I would set one side at the largest size I would make and the other side at the smallest so the opening get larger as the stars roll down, then I would put a few bins underneath to catch stars of the same relative size, I know it's difficult to understand as I'm not very good with words on this subject PM me if you have any questions.My next step is to make some star sizing screens so i can accuratley size the stars...simple matter of drilling holes in a plastic bucket Lid?...
Edited by Chaoticentity, 27 July 2004 - 02:10 AM.
#22
Posted 27 July 2004 - 06:13 AM
#23
Posted 28 July 2004 - 05:03 AM
edit: forget drilling holes let the size of the channel determine where the stars fall \ / <- leave a gap in the middle that gets larger, thus allowing stars to pass through when there diamater is smaller then the channel gap. Basically you'll build a box with a V described above in it, then incline one end of the box so that the stars will roll from one side to the otherdrop a handful of stars and they'll roll down the channel till it's large enough for the star to drop through, have 4-5 containers underneath the V to group stars to size.
Edited by Chaoticentity, 28 July 2004 - 05:10 AM.
#24
Posted 31 July 2004 - 08:49 PM
#25
Posted 01 August 2004 - 06:20 AM
Stuart
#26
Posted 01 August 2004 - 12:49 PM
Star Roller
Ball Mill
I've included a short description of each with the picture, but if anyone wants anything clarifying, just ask. Thanks again, Stuart.
#27
Posted 01 August 2004 - 07:07 PM
Has anyone thought of a rotating shaft just above head height with a tyre hung on it. 1 inch shaft at 1440 rpm 16 inch tyre, tyre doing 1440/16 = 90 rpm. then put the motor and electrics in the next room.
Keep mannequins and watermelons away from fireworks..they always get hurt..
#28
Posted 02 August 2004 - 08:03 AM
BTW, 90 RPM seems rather fast for a star roller - 30 or 40 is more usual.
Edited by Phoenix, 02 August 2004 - 08:04 AM.
#29
Posted 02 August 2004 - 01:29 PM
i could also be wrong though.
#30
Posted 02 August 2004 - 03:28 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users