
Anyone experimented with metal carbonate based colours?
#46
Posted 29 June 2010 - 11:43 AM
#47
Posted 29 June 2010 - 11:49 AM

I think hexamine could be added to the flame, but it wont react inside the flame envelope, but will still cool the flame down, as it takes energy out of the flame to evaporate it, but why not just use a chlorine donor like parlon or PVC (or even ammonium chloride, as it takes energy away more efficiently, to evaporate), and organic fuels are out of the question, you've got to think of reactivity, of which magnesium (the only affordable option) is plenty reactive enough to decompose water (formed by ammonium compounds) carbon dioxide (from carbonates) and sulfer dioxide/trioxide (from sulfates), allowing the reaction to proceed
I think the most promising mix theoretically would be along the lines of,
40 ammonium sulfate
20 ammonium chloride
15 copper carbonate
25 magnesium (I'll try both 40# and 230#)
I will test this one soon, the only way I can see these stars taking off is if we can create a good blue, to 'complete the set'
#48
Posted 29 June 2010 - 11:59 AM
Lucky with the ammonium sulphate

#49
Posted 29 June 2010 - 12:37 PM
I'll still give it a go though, and post my results.
#50
Posted 29 June 2010 - 02:29 PM
although I'm still posting will this work question, hopefully ill be able to say this will work soon. lol
hopefully i might be able to start experimenting again soon, i have a friend who is interested in learning what we do, I'm going to get him to join the site. he thinking he might know a friendly farmer, so that will help alot.
Edited by CCH Concepts, 29 June 2010 - 02:32 PM.
#51
Posted 29 June 2010 - 03:02 PM

#52
Posted 29 June 2010 - 03:09 PM
say using a magnesium sulfate with as lower hydration as possible and a barium sulfate with a high hydration they would take different times to oxidize the fuel. maybe strobing from white to green and back.
#53
Posted 29 June 2010 - 03:19 PM

#54
Posted 29 June 2010 - 07:35 PM
it would be nice to just have to replace the copper carbonate, and keep the ammonium chloride as a chlorine donor. When using ammonium perchlorate, I noticed that without and parlon and PVC you can still create fantastic colours at low temperatures, due to the chlorine in the perchlorate, and the almost non existent colour of ammonium decomposition. it would be nice to be able to replicate this with the chloride. The magnesium could 'steal' the chlorine. now I think about it, a blue seems like a lost cause with metals, copper is just too un-reactive.
I'll still give it a go though, and post my results.
Adding sulfur would form magnesium sulfate in the flame. This will prevent it from removing too much chlorine from the flame envelope. The only problem is magnesium reducing copper monochloride in a flame, so the question is how to ensure copper monochloride reforms quickly.
#55
Posted 29 June 2010 - 08:21 PM
say a star consisting of
oxidizer
organic fuel
chlorine donor
copper compound
outer layer like a prime,
oxidizer
metal fuel
chlorine donor
idea being the outer layer gets hot enough to get everything going and produces large amount of chlorine. then the inner star burns, due to the heat from the used metal fuel the organic fuel will easily light and there will be an abundance of chlorine for the copper to bond with.
would this help?
#56
Posted 29 June 2010 - 08:24 PM
Before going too enthusiastic here, you should never forget: if something it's not in use yet, there has to be a reson behind.
Edited by a_bab, 29 June 2010 - 08:30 PM.
#57
Posted 29 June 2010 - 08:41 PM
this was interesting
Manganese sulfate: Perhaps the most interesting use of sulfate is the
addition of manganese sulfate (MnSO4 H2O) to aluminum sodium nitrate
flare compositions. Farnell et al.(1972) discovered that this compound
alters "the decomposition of sodium nitrate to form oxides of nitrogen
rather than its normal decomposition products of nitrogen and oxygen."
This change results in a 55% decrease in burning rate, a 155% increase in
luminous output, and a 466% increase in luminous efficiency!
could this be the answer to the low light output problem of not using metal fuels?
manganese sulfate
aluminum sodium nitrate
chlorine donor (parlon)
Copper sulfate
#58
Posted 29 June 2010 - 10:11 PM
I am just waiting for some Magnesium due to Magnalium being a bit slaggy and temperamental if not fine enough. I find if you use Magnalium to use it in the mesh ranges of 200 - 300 otherwise you get uneven burn rates and more slag produced. If you use Magnalium in the 400 - 500 mesh range then you get a coloured flash powder.
#59
Posted 29 June 2010 - 10:40 PM
Adding sulfur would form magnesium sulfate in the flame. This will prevent it from removing too much chlorine from the flame envelope. The only problem is magnesium reducing copper monochloride in a flame, so the question is how to ensure copper monochloride reforms quickly.
I'm not too sure that their will be any oxygen produced to form the sulfate from the sulfur, i think it will just form magnesium oxide and free sulfur (that will burn outside the flame envelope) but that is what we are experimenting for.
Has anyone tried the ammonium compounds yet?
#60
Posted 29 June 2010 - 11:41 PM

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users